4.7 Article

Accurate moment tensor inversion of acoustic emissions and its application to Brazilian splitting test

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104707

Keywords

Brazilian splitting test; Focal mechanism; Moment tensor; Sensor calibration; Tensile fracturing; Weighted least squares

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [19-06422S]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51934003, 51774020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that weighted inversion and STC inversion work better than the standard least-squares method. Additionally, when the study object contains significant non-double-couple components of moment tensors, the STC inversion proved to be most accurate.
The efficiency of three inversions for accurate moment tensors: (1) the standard least-squares inversion, (2) the weighted least-squares inversion, and (3) the shear-tensile-compressive (STC) source inversion, is tested on acoustic emissions (AEs) produced during the Brazilian splitting test. A comparison of plots of the P/T axes of the focal mechanisms reveals that the double-couple part of the moment tensors is well constrained for all three inversions. By contrast, diamond source-type plots show that the non-double-couple components of the retrieved moment tensors are more sensitive to errors due to neglecting inhomogeneities and anisotropy in the rock sample, near-field terms and other wave phenomena effects. The weighted inversion and the STC inversion work better than the standard least-squares method and yield less scattered results. If moment tensors of AEs contain significant non-double-couple components of moment tensors produced by non-shear fracturing, the STC inversion proved to be most accurate. The retrieved moment tensors are well consistent with the expected fracture mechanism of AEs in the Brazilian splitting specimen and provide a further guidance for studying rock fracture processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available