4.7 Article

Plastic deformation of ITER specification tungsten: Temperature and strain rate dependent constitutive law deduced by inverse finite element analysis

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105481

Keywords

Tungsten; Constitutive law; Inverse finite element analysis; ITER; Fusion; Plasma-facing material

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 [633053]
  2. Euratom research and training programme 2019-2020 [633053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a constitutive law describing the elasto-plastic response of tungsten was derived using inverse finite element analysis (IFEA) to understand deformation beyond the onset of instability in tensile tests. A model based on thermally-activated dislocation-mediated plasticity was applied to accurately characterize the mechanical response of tungsten compliant with ITER specifications, demonstrating the ability to extrapolate the hardening law to a wider temperature and strain rate range. One advantage of this method is its applicability to neutron irradiated materials with low uniform elongation.
In this work, we have derived a constitutive law describing the elasto-plastic response of tungsten by applying an inverse finite element analysis (IFEA) to grasp the deformation well beyond the onset of deformation instability in tensile tests. A model based on the Kocks-Mecking representation of thermally-activated dislocation-mediated plasticity was applied to characterise the mechanical response of tungsten compliant with the ITER specification. The developed model accurately describes the temperature and strain rate dependent tensile properties in the temperature range 250?600 ?C. The capability to extrapolate the hardening law to a higher temperature and strain rate range is demonstrated. A particular advantage of the developed method is its applicability to neutron irradiated materials, for which the uniform elongation is often very low or even negligible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available