4.6 Article

The contagion and competitive effects across national borders: Evidence from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108115

Keywords

Earthquake; Event study; Stock return; Contagion effect; Competitive effect; Operational efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The researchers find it difficult to determine how natural disasters such as earthquakes affect firms in other countries, with some uncertainty remaining. Through their experiments, they discovered a negative impact of earthquakes on semiconductor manufacturers in China, with the contagion effect outweighing the competitive effect, especially for companies with supply chain connections to Japanese firms.
It is unclear how a natural disaster such as earthquake affects disaster-stricken firms? industry peers located in other countries. While those industry peers might benefit from the disaster due to the competitive advantage gained over the disaster-stricken firms (positive competitive effect), they might also suffer from the disaster due to their linkages to the disaster-stricken firms (negative contagion effect). Based on a natural experiment in which a series of earthquakes struck Kumamoto, Japan?s Silicon Island, in April 2016, we find that the earthquakes have a negative impact on the stock returns of the semiconductor manufacturers located in China, suggesting that the contagion effect overweighs the competitive effect. Moreover, the negative impact is more pronounced for firms with supply chain connections with Japanese firms. However, we also find a positive impact among Chinese firms with high inventory turnover and customer concentration. Overall, our research reveals the dynamic effects of a natural disaster across national borders, urging firms to pay attention to the negative contagion effect through supply chain linkages and the positive competitive effect resulting from better operational efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available