4.7 Review

Biomarkers of Angiogenesis and Neuroplasticity as Promising Clinical Tools for Stroke Recovery Evaluation

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083949

Keywords

stroke; recovery; biomarkers; prognosis; personalized medicine; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lodz [503/6-127-05/503-51-001-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Key issues affecting stroke rehabilitation clinical practice include a patient's medical history, stroke experience, recovery potential, and therapy selection. Finding biomarkers that predict brain recovery potential in stroke patients is crucial. Utilizing biomarkers for personalized medicine development and enhancing brain neuroplasticity are important in stroke rehabilitation and other central nervous system diseases.
Several key issues impact the clinical practice of stroke rehabilitation including a patient's medical history, stroke experience, the potential for recovery, and the selection of the most effective type of therapy. Until clinicians have answers to these concerns, the treatment and rehabilitation are rather intuitive, with standard procedures carried out based on subjective estimations using clinical scales. Therefore, there is a need to find biomarkers that could predict brain recovery potential in stroke patients. This review aims to present the current state-of-the-art stroke recovery biomarkers that could be used in clinical practice. The revision of biochemical biomarkers has been developed based on stroke recovery processes: angiogenesis and neuroplasticity. This paper provides an overview of the biomarkers that are considered to be ready-to-use in clinical practice and others, considered as future tools. Furthermore, this review shows the utility of biomarkers in the development of the concept of personalized medicine. Enhancing brain neuroplasticity and rehabilitation facilitation are crucial concerns not only after stroke, but in all central nervous system diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available