4.7 Review

Function Trumps Form in Two Sugar Symporters, LacY and vSGLT

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073572

Keywords

symporters; lactose permease SGLTs; structure; function

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [JA R35GM135175, EMW DK19567]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active transport of sugars into bacteria occurs through symporters driven by ion gradients, with well-studied proton sugar symporter LacY and characterized sodium sugar symporter vSGLT as the main examples. Despite structural differences, they operate through similar mechanisms driven by respective ion electrochemical potential gradients.
Active transport of sugars into bacteria occurs through symporters driven by ion gradients. LacY is the most well-studied proton sugar symporter, whereas vSGLT is the most characterized sodium sugar symporter. These are members of the major facilitator (MFS) and the amino acid-Polyamine organocation (APS) transporter superfamilies. While there is no structural homology between these transporters, they operate by a similar mechanism. They are nano-machines driven by their respective ion electrochemical potential gradients across the membrane. LacY has 12 transmembrane helices (TMs) organized in two 6-TM bundles, each containing two 3-helix TM repeats. vSGLT has a core structure of 10 TM helices organized in two inverted repeats (TM 1-5 and TM 6-10). In each case, a single sugar is bound in a central cavity and sugar selectivity is determined by hydrogen- and hydrophobic- bonding with side chains in the binding site. In vSGLT, the sodium-binding site is formed through coordination with carbonyl- and hydroxyl-oxygens from neighboring side chains, whereas in LacY the proton (H3O+) site is thought to be a single glutamate residue (Glu325). The remaining challenge for both transporters is to determine how ion electrochemical potential gradients drive uphill sugar transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available