Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104431
Keywords
Standardized nursing terminology; Terminology; Classification; Review; Nurses; Nurse midwives
Categories
Funding
- Office of the Nursing and Midwifery Services Director, Health Service Executive (HSE), Ireland
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study explored the use and impact of standardized terminologies within nursing and midwifery practice across 25 different countries and identified that the impact of STs on practice depended on various factors such as healthcare setting, patient cohort, nursing experience, provision of education and support in using the ST, and usability of EHRs.
Aim: To explore the use and impact of standardized terminologies (STs) within nursing and midwifery practice. Introduction: The standardization of clinical documentation creates a potential to optimize patient care and safety. Nurses and midwives, who represent the largest proportion of the healthcare workforce worldwide, have been using nursing-specific and multidisciplinary STs within electronic health records (EHRs) for decades. However, little is known regarding ST use and impact within clinical practice. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted (2019) across PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and CENTRAL in collaboration with the Five Country Nursing and Midwifery Digital Leadership Group (DLG). Identified studies (n = 3547) were reviewed against a number of agreed criterion, and data were extracted from included studies. Studies were categorized and findings were reviewed by the DLG. Results: One hundred and eighty three studies met the inclusion criteria. These were conducted across 25 different countries and in various healthcare settings, utilising mainly nursing-specific (most commonly NANDAI, NIC, NOC and the Omaha System) and less frequently local, multidisciplinary or medical STs (e.g., ICD). Within the studies, STs were evaluated in terms of Measurement properties, Usability, Documentation quality, Patient care, Knowledge generation, and Education (pre and post registration). As well as the ST content, the impact of the ST on practice depended on the healthcare setting, patient cohort, nursing experience, provision of education and support in using the ST, and usability of EHRs. Conclusion: Employment of STs in clinical practice has the capability to improve communication, quality of care and interoperability, as well as facilitate value-based healthcare and knowledge generation. However, employment of several different STs and study heterogeneity renders it difficult to aggregate and generalize findings.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available