4.4 Article

Physical workload and psychosocial working conditions in Swedish pig transport drivers

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103124

Keywords

Occupational exposure; Physical; Psychosocial; Velocity; Movement; Handling; Pigs; Preslaughter transport

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2016-01778]
  2. Formas [2016-01778] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The working conditions of Swedish pig transport drivers were assessed to find excessive physical load on shoulders and backs, as well as knee discomfort related to inadequate design of loading areas. Variations in workload were explained by differences in physical working environment and pig handling practices among drivers. High job satisfaction and commitment were reported by the drivers despite conflicts with stakeholders and regulatory issues.
Working conditions of 20 Swedish pig transport drivers (PTD) were assessed by a questionnaire, a workshop, and recorded postures and movements during on-farm loading, driving, unloading at abattoir and vehicle cleaning. High arm positions and high frequencies of shoulder problems indicated an excessive physical load on shoulders. Extreme crouching postures inside vehicles and high frequencies of lower back problems indicated high load on the back of PTDs. Inadequate design of on-farm loading areas was associated with knee discomfort. Observed variation in workload between PTDs could be explained by differences in physical working environment and pig handling practices. PTDs reported high job satisfaction and commitment although conflicts with farmers and official veterinarians, as well as regulatory conflicts were emphasized. We conclude that issues of inadequate farm and abattoir facilities, stakeholder conflicts and insufficient training in animal handling need to be addressed to ensure sustainable PTD working conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available