4.7 Article

Successful pathway for locally driven fuel cell electric vehicle adoption: Early evidence from South Korea

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 42, Pages 21764-21776

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.057

Keywords

Fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV); Fs; QCA; Pathway; Hydrogen economy

Funding

  1. new faculty research fund of Ajou university

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores potential pathways for successful adoption of FCEVs in South Korea, identifying three promising routes based on 16 regional cases. The study highlights the importance of factors such as number of hydrogen stations, levels of greenhouse gases, local government initiatives, and subsidies in driving FCEV adoption. This research provides valuable insights for latecomer countries looking to transition to a hydrogen economy.
South Korea is an outstanding pioneer of fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) technology, an industry that is fundamental to the hydrogen ecosystem. This study aims to explore possible pathways for the successful adoption of FCEV in the local region. By using the fuzzy-set quality comparative analysis (fs/QCA) method, we identify three auspicious pathways based on the 16 regional cases in Korea. We find that, first, a large number of hydrogen (H-2) stations will lead to successful FCEV adoption (H-2 STATION -> FCEV). Second, the combination of high levels of greenhouse gases(GHGs) and the local government driven future construction plans of H-2 stations can also be a remarkable pathway (GHGs* PLAN -> FCEV). Lastly, a combination of high levels of GHGs and subsidies can be another compelling pathway (GHGs* SUBSIDIES -> FCEV). This study provides early evidence of FCEVs adoption and can be of use to latecomer countries to the hydrogen economy. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available