4.7 Article

Zr and Fe on Pt/CeO2-MOx/Al2O3 catalysts for WGS reaction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 13978-13989

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6646

Keywords

doped ceria; Fe; H-2‐ TPD; Pt; ceria catalysts; WGS reaction; WGS‐ TPSR; Zr

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [RTI2018-096294-B-C33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the functional modifications induced by Zr and Fe as dopants in Pt/CeO2-MOx/Al2O3 catalysts to improve water gas shift performance. Iron and zirconia dopants significantly influence the activity and reaction mechanisms of Pt/ceria catalysts, with a synergistic effect observed when both metals are combined, leading to higher CO conversion rates and catalytic activity.
By evaluating the functional modifications induced by Zr and Fe as dopants in Pt/CeO2-MOx/Al2O3 catalysts (M = Fe and Zr), the key features for improving water gas shift (WGS) performance for these systems have been addressed. Pt/ceria intrinsic WGS activity is often related to improved H-2 surface dynamics, H2O absorption, retentions and dissociation capacities which are influenced greatly by the support nature. Two metals, iron and zirconia, were chosen as ceria dopants in this work, either in separate manner or combined. Iron incorporation resulted in CO-redox properties and oxygen storage capacities (OSC) improvement but the formation of Ce-Fe solid solutions did not offer any catalytic benefit, while the Zr incorporation influenced in a great manner surface electron densities and shows higher catalytic activity. When combined both metals showed an important synergy evidenced by 30% higher CO conversions and attributed to greater surface electron densities population and therefore absorption and activity. This work demonstrates that for Pt/ceria catalysts OSC enhancement does not necessarily imply a catalytic promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available