4.3 Article

Research on dropping test and numerical simulation for unmanned aerial vehicle

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 1205-1221

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2021.1926824

Keywords

UAV; drop test; impact load; numerical simulation

Funding

  1. Civil Aviation Security Capacity Building Fund
  2. Civil Aircraft 13th Five Year Pre Research Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studied the impact load and damage mechanism of a 4.78kg quad rotor UAV through numerical modeling and experimental validation. The study found that the speed, heading angle, and pitch angle of the UAV have a significant impact on the collision outcome.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) may lose control and collide with other objects in the air, thus causing serious flight safety accidents. In this paper, the impact load and damage mechanism of 4.78 kg quad rotor UAV were studied. First, the accurate numerical model of UAV was established in the explicit dynamic analysis software LS-DYNA. Then the overall drop simulation and test of UAV with two different heights were carried out. Finally, the results were compared and analyzed. The high coincidence of experimental results and simulation results showed that the calculation method and simulation model are reasonable. On this basis, the impact load and damage of UAV in different speeds, heading angles and pitch angles were simulated and analyzed. The results revealed that the heading angle, pitch angle and velocity of UAV during collision have a significant effect on the impact load between UAV and the impacted object. It also affected the damage degree of UAV itself. In the collision, the arm of the UAV tended to break at the position joined to the fuselage. The battery hanging on the fuselage was also liable to separate from the fuselage. The research results of this paper have a certain guiding significance for the formulation of UAV safe flight airworthiness regulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available