4.6 Article

A multi-scale modelling framework for anisotropy prediction in aluminium alloy sheet and its application in the optimisation of the deep-drawing process

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 11-12, Pages 3401-3417

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07060-z

Keywords

Crystal plasticity; Multi-scale modelling; Phenomenological yield function; Mechanical anisotropy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12002211]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [20YF1432700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a crystallographic texture-based multi-scale modelling framework to predict mechanical anisotropy of textured aluminium alloy sheet. The approach directly obtained mechanical anisotropy of materials from crystal plasticity modelling without extensive directional tensile tests, and the multi-scale scheme predicted earing profiles coincide well with experimental measurements. This multi-scale modelling could be utilised to design an optimised blank shape with minimum earing for the deep-drawn component, and a convoluted cut-edge was devised accordingly.
This study proposed a crystallographic texture-based multi-scale modelling framework to predict mechanical anisotropy of textured aluminium alloy sheet. The multi-scale scheme was constructed by the combination of a full-field crystal plasticity model in mesoscopic scale and a newly developed phenomenological yield function in continuum scale. In this approach, the mechanical anisotropy of materials is directly obtained from crystal plasticity (CP) modelling without extensive directional tensile tests. The results show that the multi-scale scheme predicted earing profiles coincide well with experimental measurements. This multi-scale modelling could be utilised to design an optimised blank shape with minimum earing for the deep-drawn component, and a convoluted cut-edge was devised accordingly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available