4.6 Article

Comparison of wire-arc and powder-laser additive manufacturing for IN718 superalloy: unified consideration for selecting process parameters based on volumetric energy density

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06990-y

Keywords

Cladding; Additive manufacturing; Process parameters; Energy density; IN718 superalloy

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  2. Yunnan Postdoctoral Research Found Project
  3. Kunming University of Science and Technology Postdoctoral Academic Activities Foundation
  4. Kunming University of Science and Technology Startup Research Grant for Distinguished Scholar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proper selection of initial process parameters is crucial for the successful fabrication of large IN718 superalloy parts using additive manufacturing techniques like WAAM and PLAM. The relationship between energy density and controllable parameters plays a significant role in ensuring high quality and defect-free cladding beads. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is a major factor contributing to the efficiency of WAAM over PLAM.
Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) as well as powder-laser additive manufacturing (PLAM) are both promising cladding additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for fabricating large IN718 superalloy parts. Correct selection of initial process parameters is an important prerequisite to ensure the success of subsequent AM stage and its dynamic adjustment. For comparing the relationship between the process parameters and their influence on the quality of WAAM and PLAM cladding beads, the relationship between the energy density and the most controllable parameters was comparatively studied from the perspective of unified energy dissipation and the weldability. The equal effective volumetric energy density can be obtained under different combinations of WAAM and PLAM parameters. The defects such as porosity formation, centerline grain boundary, and liquation cracking are mainly affected by the cladding speed, rather than the effective volumetric energy density. During WAAM and PLAM, the corresponding effective volumetric energy density range which can avoid internal and external defects is in the theoretical weldable zone of IN718 superalloy. The key to obtain a defect-free cladding bead is to properly control the energy input and its distribution. The high material utilization under equal effective power and cladding speed is the main reason why WAAM is more efficient than PLAM. According to the energy dissipation hypothesis and related formulas, different energy beam-based AM processes can be further compared under the equal energy input, which provides a basis for the selection of initial process parameters and the dynamic adjustment of main parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available