4.6 Article

Study on effects of tool nose radius on the formation mechanism of edge defects during milling SiCp/Al composites

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07018-1

Keywords

SiCp; Al composites; Milling; Tool nose radius; Edge defects

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075168, 51605161, 51975208]
  2. Project of Department of Education of Hunan Province [19B190]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan University of Science and Technology [KJ-2042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By optimizing the tool nose radius, the edge defects of SiCp/Al composites can be improved. Experimental results showed that with an increase in tool nose radius, the chips became shorter and wider, and cutting force also increased.
Silicon carbide particulate reinforced aluminum matrix composites (SiCp/Al) have received considerable attention in many engineering applications. However, the existence of dispersing SiC particles leads to particularly vulnerable edge quality of SiCp/Al composites in machining. It is very significant to improve the edge defects of SiCp/Al composites by optimizing the tool geometry. Cutting tool nose radius mainly determines the machining performance. Therefore, the effects of tool nose radius on the chip topography, cutting force, and edge geometry in face and dry milling of 20% SiCp/Al composites were investigated in the current work. Experiments were conducted with tool nose radius of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm. The results showed that the shorter and wider chips were found with the increment in tool nose radius. It was also observed that the cutting force increased with the increment in tool nose radius. Based on the material removal mechanism with different tool nose radius, the feature maps of edge defects in SiCp/Al composites were established and studied. It was found that the outer and inner edge quality of the materials was improved with the increase of tool nose radius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available