4.7 Article

Effects of layer arrangement on heating uniformity and product quality after hot air assisted radio frequency drying of carrot

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102667

Keywords

Carrot slices; Heating uniformity; Radio frequency; Combined drying; Quality

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400900]
  2. Key Laboratory of PostHarvest handling of fruits, Ministry of Agriculture [GPCH201703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effects of intermittently rearranging layers on the heating uniformity, drying characteristics, and quality of carrot slices under hot air assisted radio frequency heating. The combined drying method reduced drying time and maintained the highest total carotenoid value in carrot slices. This method is effective in improving drying rate and preserving heat sensitive substances in carrots.
The conventional drying technology prolongs the shelf life of carrots but may cause the serious loss of nutrients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of intermittently rearranging layers on the heating uniformity, drying characteristics and quality of carrot slices under the hot air assisted radio frequency (RF) heating. The carrot slices were dried for 270 min using hot air (60 ?C) assisted RF heating at the electrode gap of 100 mm firstly, and then followed hot air drying to achieve the final moisture level (0.11 kg/kg (d.b.)). The results showed that the selected hot air assisted RF drying protocol for the carrot slices reduced 30% of the duration compared to the single hot air drying. The carrot slices dried by the combined drying method had the highest total carotenoid value (P ? 0.05) except for possessing accepted color and rehydration. Therefore, the combined drying method could improve the drying rate and maintain heat sensitive substances in carrot slices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available