4.4 Article

Intramuscular MAPK signaling following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained men

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 9, Pages 1663-1670

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3417-8

Keywords

Mitogen-activated protein kinase; Anabolic intramuscular signaling; ERK; p38; JNK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To examine the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family of signaling proteins following typical high volume (HV) and high intensity (HI) lower body resistance exercise protocols in resistance-trained men. Methods Ten resistance-trained men (24.7 +/- 3.4 year; 90.1 +/- 11.3 kg; 176.0 +/- 4.9 cm) performed each resistance exercise protocol in a random, counterbalanced order. The HV protocol utilized a load of 70 % 1-RM for sets of 10-12 repetitions with a 1-min rest period length between sets and exercises. The HI protocol utilized a load of 90 % 1-RM for sets of 3-5 repetitions with a 3-min rest period length between sets and exercises. Both protocols included six sets of barbell back squats and four sets of bilateral leg press, bilateral hamstring curls, bilateral leg extensions, and seated calf raises. Fine needle muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis were completed at baseline (BL) and 1-h post exercise (1H). Results No significant differences over time were noted for phosphorylation of MEK1, ERK1/2, p38, MSK1, ATF2, p53, or c-Jun (p > 0.05). No significance between trial interactions was noted for phosphorylation of MAPK signaling proteins, including MEK1, ERK1/2, p38, JNK, MSK1, ATF2, STAT1, p53, c-Jun, or HSP27 (p > 0.05). However, significant time effects were observed for phosphorylation of JNK (p < 0.01), HSP27 (p < 0.01), and STAT1 (p = 0.03). Phosphorylation of JNK, HSP27, and STAT1 was significantly elevated from BL at 1H for both HV and HI. Conclusions HV and HI lower body resistance exercise protocols appear to elicit similar MAPK activation in resistance-trained men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available