4.4 Article

Examination of a neural cross-over effect using resting mechanomyographic mean frequency from the vastus lateralis muscle in different resting positions following aerobic exercise

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages 919-929

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3351-9

Keywords

Aerobic exercise; Cross-education; Cross-over; Mechanomyography; Relaxation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate the potential neural cross-over effect between the vastus lateralis muscles in different postural resting positions. Methods Subjects exercised on an upright cycle ergometer, using only their dominate leg, for 2 min at 30 % VO2 peak. Following this warm-up, subjects then cycled (still using only their dominant leg) for 30 min at 60 % VO2 peak. After the aerobic phase, subjects cooled down (again, using only their dominant leg) for 2 min at 30 % VO2 peak. Resting mechanomyography mean frequency was measured prior to and following aerobic exercise. Results There was an approximate 6.3 +/- 6.8 and a 10 +/- 5.1 % increase (upright sitting position with the subject's knee joint angle fixed at 180 ); an approximate 7 +/- 6.6 and a 16.1 +/- 6.5 % increase (upright sitting position with the subject's knee joint angle fixed at 90 ); an approximate 0.5 +/- 6.8 and 3.7 +/- 5.6 % increase (lying supine position with the subject's knee joint angle fixed at 180 ); and an approximately 2 +/- 8.3 and 2.5 +/- 8.6 % increase (lying supine position with the subject's knee joint angle fixed at 90 ) in normalized mechanomyography mean frequency after aerobic exercise for the dominant and non-dominate vastus lateralis muscles, respectfully. Conclusion There appears to be a statistically significant neural cross-over effect for the vastus lateralis muscle, during three of the four postural resting positions, with the non-dominant vastus lateralis muscle having a greater increase in mechanomyography mean frequency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available