4.5 Article

Exploring donor's intention in charitable crowdfunding: intrinsic and extrinsic motivations

Journal

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 1664-1683

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-11-2020-0631

Keywords

Extrinsic motivation; Intrinsic motivation; Self-determination theory; Stimulus-organism-response framework; Crowdfunding

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y21G010040]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilized self-determination theory and stimulus-organism-response framework to explore the motivations of crowdfunding donors, finding that perceived ease of use, self-efficacy, and social connection positively influence donation intentions through a combination of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations. The findings contribute to advancing knowledge of individual fund motivation in donation-based crowdfunding and offer guidelines for theory and practice development in this area.
Purpose This study adopts self-determination theory and stimulus-organism-response framework to develop a model that explores the motivations of such donors by considering their self-determination needs and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations. Design/methodology/approach Based on online survey data collected from 436 crowdfunding donors in China, this study follows a structural equation modeling analysis to test hypotheses. Findings The results indicate that perceived ease of use, perceived self-efficacy and social connection have positive effects on the donation intentions of backers through a combination of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations. Originality/value The findings shed light on various extrinsic and intrinsic motivations advancing knowledge of individual fund motivation in donation-based crowdfunding and provide guidelines for the development of donation-based crowdfunding theory and practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available