4.6 Article

Effects of Amine Structures on Oxidative Degradation of Amine-Functionalized Adsorbents for CO2 Capture

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 13, Pages 4942-4950

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05694

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
  2. Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different amines were evaluated for their effects on the stability of CO2 adsorbents in dry and wet oxygen environments. Amines with high molecular weight and long chain alkyl linkers demonstrated higher resistance to oxygen. Additionally, the presence of steam was found to affect the oxidative degradation of amine-based CO2 sorbents depending on the amine structure.
A series of adsorbents containing different amines including diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine, pentaethylenehexamine, branched poly(ethylenimine), and spermine were exposed to flowing O-2 at accelerated temperatures of 80 and 100 degrees C. Herein, we evaluated the structural effects of amines on the stability of CO2 adsorbents in dry and wet O-2-containing environments. Various techniques were used to characterize the adsorbents. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the sorbents was drastically reduced after exposure to dry O-2-containing environments. Sorbents modified with amines with a high molecular weight and a long chain of alkyl linkers between amine functional groups exhibited high resistance to O-2. The viscosity of the amines played an important role in the oxidative stability of the amine composites as it affected the mass transfer of O-2 to the amine sites of the composites. Furthermore, we report for the first time that the presence of steam in O-2 medium could suppress or accelerate the oxidative degradation of amine-based CO2 sorbents depending on the amine structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available