4.6 Article

Respiratory performance of humans exposed to moderate levels of carbon dioxide

Journal

INDOOR AIR
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 1540-1552

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12823

Keywords

End‐ tidal CO2; forced vital capacity; future buildings; respiration; spirometry; ventilation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a business as usual scenario, atmospheric CO2 concentration may reach 950 ppm by 2100, leading to indoor CO2 levels rising. Poor ventilation could affect respiratory parameters, potentially due to increased concentrations of pollutants other than CO2, such as human bioeffluents.
In a business as usual scenario, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (CO2) could reach 950 parts per million (ppm) by 2100. Indoor CO2 concentrations will rise consequently, given its dependence on atmospheric CO2 levels. If buildings are ventilated following current standards in 2100, indoor CO2 concentration could be over 1300 ppm, depending on specific ventilation codes. Such exposure to CO2 could have physiological and psychological effects on building occupants. We conducted a randomized, within-subject study, examining the physiological effects on the respiratory functions of 15 persons. We examined three exposures, each 150 min long, with CO2 of: 900 ppm (reference), 1450 ppm (decreased ventilation), and 1450 ppm (reference condition with added pure CO2). We measured respiratory parameters with capnometry and forced vital capacity (FVC) tests. End-tidal CO2 and respiration rates did not significantly differ across the three exposures. Parameters measured using FVC decreased significantly from the start to the end of exposure only at the reduced ventilation condition (p < 0.04, large effect size). Hence, poor ventilation likely affects respiratory parameters. This effect is probably not caused by increased CO2 alone and rather by other pollutants-predominantly human bioeffluents in this work-whose concentrations increased as a result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available