4.5 Review

Ageing of T-dependent B cell responses

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages 97-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2021.03.012

Keywords

B cells; T cells; Ageing

Categories

Funding

  1. Inspire Program of the R 'egion Occitanie/Pyrenees-Mediterranee regional government [1901175]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [MP0022856]
  3. Institut National contre le Cancer [INCA-12642]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-16-CE15-0019-02, ANR-16-CE15-0002-02]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE15-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental factors and age can affect the efficiency of the immune system, especially the decline in immune cells and cellular immunity in the elderly. Immunosenescence affects T and B cells, leading to weakened lymphocyte responses to vaccines and pathogens.
The human immune system is in continuous interaction with environmental factors (pathogens, exercise, stress, pollutants, diet, vaccines, and therapeutics) that condition its efficiency by promoting or moderating multiple immune mechanisms. While the deleterious impact of external factors can be avoided or limited, the immune system itself grows weaker with age. Immune cells persist in the elderly, and the observed decline of cellular immunity is related to cellular senescence. Immunosenescence, which affects both T and B cells, erodes lymphocyte-dependent responses to vaccines and pathogens. Germinal centers (GCs), the organized lymphoid structures where B cells engage in affinity maturation, are regulated by follicular helper (Tfh) and follicular regulatory (Tfr) T cells, the major T cell components of GCs. This review discusses how age-related changes affect Tfh and Tfr cells as key components of B cell immunity, and how they ultimately shape the response of the ageing immune system to vaccines and infectious challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available