4.7 Article

Camera Orientation Optimization in Stereo Vision Systems for Low Measurement Error

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 1178-1182

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.3019305

Keywords

Accuracy evaluation; error propagation model; stereo vision (SV); 3-D reconstruction

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences, and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stereo vision is widely used for industrial measurement, and the optimal camera orientation angle is typically between 60 to 80 degrees, as supported by a new model that considers the correlation between camera orientation and measurement accuracy. Different from previous theories, practical systems often operate outside the theoretical optimal range.
Stereo vision (SV) is widely used for noncontact three-dimensional industrial measurement. In SV systems, camera orientation (the angles formed by the two cameras optical axes across the baseline) is among the factors that influence the measurement accuracy. Presently, there is a great divergence regarding the optimal value of camera orientation, i.e., existing theoretical analyses suggest that the optimal angle lies in 30 degrees-50 degrees; however, a camera orientation angle between 60 degrees-80 degrees is typically used in practical SV systems and commercial products. Unlike previous models that treated system parameters as uncorrelated, the proposed model introduces covariance to model the correlation between camera orientation and the accuracy of detecting corresponding points. The proposed model proves the optimal camera orientation angle lies in 60 degrees-80 degrees, which was verified experimentally via measurements with a circle center tracker (CCT), fringe projection profilometry (FPP), and stereo digital image correlation (DIC).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available