4.7 Article

Yield variation of double-rice in response to climate change in Southern China

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 161-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.014

Keywords

Climate change; Double-rice cropping; Yield variation; Yield stagnation; Farming adaptation

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2016QC64]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0567]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food security is a major concern in China due to increasing nutritional demands, limited resources, and a changing and uncertain climate. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) plays an important role in food security, whilst its yield is greatly influenced by climate change. Thus, it is critical to quantify changes in rice yield, determine the potential climatic conditions affecting yield variation, and identify strategies to counter the effects of climate change. Historical double-rice yields and climatic variables were analyzed in the major double-rice region of Southern China. Yield varied nonlinearly in most provinces, fluctuated more for late rice, and exhibited stagnation in 1980-2012. During the growth stages, the mean temperature (T-mean) increased significantly at 75.1% of the stations examined (P < 0.05), while high inter-annual variation in precipitation (Prec) and radiation (Rad) decreased for 64.2% and 62.2% of stations. The joint effects of the three climatic variables increased yields of early- and late-rice by 0.51% and 2.83%, respectively. Climatic variation accounted for 40.04% and 29.72% of yield variability for early- and late-rice, respectively. Thus, double-rice production in Southern China is strongly affected by inter-annual climatic variation, requiring resilient farming practices to adapt to climate change and consequently enhance food security. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available