4.7 Article

Auditing Cache Data Integrity in the Edge Computing Environment

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2020.3043755

Keywords

Edge computing; data integrity; data cache; data replica; integrity audit; merkle hash tree

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Projects [DP180100212, DP200102491]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Edge computing allows app vendors to deploy applications and data on distributed servers for better user experience. However, ensuring data integrity in this environment is challenging. Therefore, effectively auditing data integrity becomes a critical issue.
Edge computing allows app vendors to deploy their applications and relevant data on distributed edge servers to serve nearby users. Caching data on edge servers can minimize users' data retrieval latency. However, such cache data are subject to both intentional and accidental corruption in the highly distributed, dynamic, and volatile edge computing environment. Given a large number of edge servers and their limited computing resources, how to effectively and efficiently audit the integrity of app vendors' cache data is a critical and challenging problem. This article makes the first attempt to tackle this Edge Data Integrity (EDI) problem. We first analyze the threat model and the audit objectives, then propose a lightweight sampling-based probabilistic approach, namely EDI-V, to help app vendors audit the integrity of their data cached on a large scale of edge servers. We propose a new data structure named variable Merkle hash tree (VMHT) for generating the integrity proofs of those data replicas during the audit. VMHT can ensure the audit accuracy of EDI-V by maintaining sampling uniformity. EDI-V allows app vendors to inspect their cache data and locate the corrupted ones efficiently and effectively. Both theoretical analysis and comprehensively experimental evaluation demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of EDI-V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available