4.5 Article

Combined Temperature and Radiation Effects on the Gain of Er- and Er-Yb-Doped Fiber Amplifiers

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 793-800

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2021.3069016

Keywords

Erbium; erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA); erbium-ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier (EYDFA); optical fibers; radiation effects; X-rays; ytterbium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research shows that the coupled radiation and temperature effect has a minor impact on the gain of Erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and Erbium-ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier (EYDFA). Furthermore, the study also found that radiation-induced attenuation (RIA) kinetics of rare-earth-doped fibers can be influenced by the presence of codopant cerium.
We investigated the coupled radiation and temperature effect on the gain degradation of erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and erbium-ytterbium-doped fiber amplifier (EYDFA). The irradiation temperatures range from -40 degrees C to 120 degrees C. Steady-state X-ray (40 keV, 300 krad (SiO2), similar to 27 rad/s) experiments provide evidence for a minor coupled radiation and temperature effect on the gains of both reference and radiation-tolerant EDFA and EYDFA. This is an important result as it validates the reliance on room-temperature testing in establishing the suitability of fiber amplifiers for space applications. Furthermore, we also investigated the radiation-induced attenuation (RIA) kinetics during and after the various rare-earth-doped fiber irradiations to improve our knowledge of the basic radiation-effects mechanisms and their dependence on the temperature during irradiation. It appears that these effects also depend on the presence of cerium, a codopant that is incorporated to passivate the Al- or P-related defects and then to enhance the amplifier radiation tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available