4.5 Article

Two-Stage Estimation for Quantum Detector Tomography: Error Analysis, Numerical and Experimental Results

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 2293-2307

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3062596

Keywords

Quantum system; quantum detector tomography; two-stage estimation; computational complexity

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme [DP190101566, DP180101805]
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology [CE170100012]
  3. U.S. Office of Naval Research Global [N62909-19-1-2129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum detector tomography is a fundamental technique for calibrating quantum devices and performing quantum engineering tasks. In this paper, a novel quantum detector tomography method is proposed. The Two-stage Estimation method has computational complexity O(nd(2)M) and is validated through simulation and a quantum optical experiment.
Quantum detector tomography is a fundamental technique for calibrating quantum devices and performing quantum engineering tasks. In this paper, a novel quantum detector tomography method is proposed. First, a series of different probe states are used to generate measurement data. Then, using constrained linear regression estimation, a stage-1 estimation of the detector is obtained. Finally, the positive semidefinite requirement is added to guarantee a physical stage-2 estimation. This Two-stage Estimation (TSE) method has computational complexity O(nd(2)M), where n is the number of d-dimensional detector matrices and M is the number of different probe states. An error upper bound is established, and optimization on the coherent probe states is investigated. We perform simulation and a quantum optical experiment to testify the effectiveness of the TSE method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available