4.7 Article

New approach to determine biological and environmental factors influencing mass of a single pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed in Silesia region in Poland using a CART model

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 29-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.025

Keywords

Yield modeling; Multivariate analysis; Regression tree; Pea variety; Pod length

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Grant [N N310 151837]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are many factors that influence the mass of a single pea seed. Because peas are an important edible legume crop of high biological value, we aimed at assessing the determinants of a single pea-seed mass based on thirteen predictors, grouped as: morphological, weather and Rhizobium vaccines. In a three-year field experiment, the biological and habitat characteristics of the yielding of two edible peas, i.e., semi-leafless cv. 'Tarchalska' and traditional foliage cv. 'Klif', were studied. A collection of 8446 observations was used to construct a CART regression tree. The CART model allowed us to build a regression tree with 14 terminal nodes and produced a Pearson correlation coefficient, between predicted and actual masses of seeds, of 0.71. The model satisfactorily explained the variation in the mass of a single pea-seed. It was found that the single pea-seed mass is affected mostly by 4 predictors: 'K index', which describes the hydrothermal conditions during pea sowing-emergence (K s-e) and emergence-maturity (K e-m) periods, 'length of pod' and 'cultivar'. In the CART model, the optimal K s-e index and long pods were always associated with higher seed mass. The mass of a single pea-seed also depended on the 'Fruiting node' larger seeds developed on the lowest nodes of a stem. Two factors had a marginal effect on the mass of single pea-seeds: 'Rhizobium vaccine' and 'pod position per node'. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available