4.7 Article

Precipitation Merging Based on the Triple Collocation Method Across Mainland China

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 3161-3176

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3008033

Keywords

China; merging; precipitation; snowfall; triple collocation (TC)

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFC1506500]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41901343]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630037, 2019T120021]
  5. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [OFSLRSS201909]
  6. Global Water Futures
  7. NASA MEaSUREs [NNH17ZDA001N-MEASURES]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully merged precipitation data from CMORPH, PER-SIANN, and ERA5 using the TC method, demonstrating its effectiveness in precipitation merging. Comparison results of two weighting methods and two merging strategies indicate that the RS strategy performs better in winter and has the potential to improve precipitation estimates accuracy in high-altitude regions.
Triple collocation (TC) is a novel method for quantifying the uncertainties of three data sets with mutually independent errors and has been widely used over different geographical fields. Researches in recent years report that TC shows potential in merging multiple data sets from different sources, while the TC-based merging method has not been used over precipitation. Using the TC formulation, this study merges precipitation from the Climate Prediction Center's morphing technique (CMORPH), Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PER-SIANN), and the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA5). The interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim) is also involved to act as the substitute of ERA5 in some specific experiments for quality comparison between them. Merged data sets are produced at 0.25 degrees x 0.25 degrees and daily resolutions from March 2000 to December 2013 over Mainland China, using ground observations from more than 2000 rain gauges as the validation benchmark. First, the effectiveness of the TC-based method for precipitation merging is assessed. Then, two weighting methods using root-mean-square error (RMSE) in logarithmic scale (log-RMSE) and modified scale (mod-RMSE) are compared because previous studies show that mod-RMSE is more suitable for characterizing errors within estimated data. Meanwhile, two merging strategies are designed, that is, merging rainfall and snowfall separately (RS) and merging precipitation directly (P). The results show that 1) all the merged products are superior to any input product which proves that the TC method is effective in precipitation merging; 2) TC-based merging generally has a better performance than dynamic Bayesian model averaging (DBMA)-based merging; 3) mod-RMSE shows worse performance in weight estimation than log-RMSE because mod-RMSE will deteriorate the impact of the underestimated inputs; and 4) RS-based merging is superior to P-based merging, and the superiority is particularly notable in winter. The RS strategy will be very helpful in improving the accuracy of precipitation estimates in cold climate such as over mountainous and high-altitude regions. Finally, the limitations of the TC method and potential solutions are discussed. This study demonstrates the great potential of the TC-based merging method in precipitation and provides insights into its application and development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available