4.6 Article

PDE Traffic Observer Validated on Freeway Data

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 1048-1060

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2020.2989101

Keywords

Observers; Data models; Numerical models; Traffic control; Mathematical model; Predictive models; Aw-Rascle-Zhang model; backstepping method; boundary observer; data validation; traffic estimation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a boundary observer for congested freeway traffic state estimation based on the ARZ model. The method allows the estimation of aggregated traffic states in a freeway segment from boundary measurements without knowledge of initial states, ensuring stability and convergence to zero of the estimation error system.
This article develops a boundary observer for the estimation of congested freeway traffic states based on the Aw-Rascle-Zhang (ARZ) partial differential equations (PDEs) model. Traffic state estimation refers to the acquisition of traffic state information from partially observed traffic data. This problem is relevant for freeway due to its limited accessibility to real-time traffic information. We propose a model-driven approach in which the estimation of aggregated traffic states in a freeway segment is obtained simply from the boundary measurement of flow and velocity without knowledge of the initial states. The macroscopic traffic dynamics is represented by the ARZ model, a 2x2 coupled nonlinear hyperbolic PDEs for traffic density and velocity. Using the PDE backstepping method, we construct a boundary observer consisting of a copy of the nonlinear plant with output injections from boundary measurement errors. The exponential stability of the estimation error system in the L-2 norm and finite-time convergence to zero is guaranteed. Numerical simulation and data validation are conducted to validate the boundary observer design with vehicle trajectory data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available