4.7 Article

Private Information Retrieval for a Multi-Message Scenario With Private Side Information

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 3235-3244

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3054764

Keywords

Servers; Libraries; Privacy; Indexes; Information retrieval; Electronic mail; Databases; Private information retrieval; private side information; storage constraints; MDS codes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the issue of private information retrieval, where a user with private side information aims to retrieve multiple files from servers. Results indicate that in certain scenarios, the minimum load imposed by servers is equivalent to the capacity of a problem without PSI.
We consider the problem of private information retrieval (PIR), where a single user with private side information (PSI) aims to retrieve multiple files from a library stored at some servers. We assume that the side information (SI) at the user includes a subset of files stored privately. Moreover, the identity of requests and side information at the user are not revealed to any of the servers. The problem involves finding the minimum load transmitted from the servers to the user such that the requested files can be decoded with the help of received data and side information. By providing matching lower and upper bounds for certain regimes, we characterize the minimum load imposed on all the servers. Our result shows that the capacity is the same as the capacity of a multi-message PIR problem without PSI, but with a library of reduced size, i.e., the library is equal to the original library size minus the size of SI. Finally, we extend our setup to the case where instead of storing complete files as SI, the user can store a fraction of files. For this scenario, we propose an achievability scheme based on which we discuss the best storing strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available