4.7 Review

The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: a continual challenge

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 774-+

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw224

Keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Cardioprotection; Coronary microvascular dysfunction; Infarct size; Postconditioning; Preconditioning; Remote conditioning; Reperfusion; Reperfusion injury

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [He 1320/18-3, SFB 1116/B8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has decreased over the last two decades in developed countries, but mortality from STEMI despite widespread access to reperfusion therapy is still substantial as is the development of heart failure, particularly among an expanding older population. In developing countries, the incidence of STEMI is increasing and interventional reperfusion is often not available. We here review the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion, notably the temporal and spatial evolution of ischaemic and reperfusion injury, the different modes of cell death, and the resulting coronary microvascular dysfunction. We then go on to briefly characterize the cardioprotective phenomena of ischaemic preconditioning, ischaemic postconditioning, and remote ischaemic conditioning and their underlying signal transduction pathways. We discuss in detail the attempts to translate conditioning strategies and drug therapy into the clinical setting. Most attempts have failed so far to reduce infarct size and improve clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, and we discuss potential reasons for such failure. Currently, it appears that remote ischaemic conditioning and a few drugs (atrial natriuretic peptide, exenatide, metoprolol, and esmolol) reduce infarct size, but studies with clinical outcome as primary endpoint are still underway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available