4.5 Article

Assessment of diastolic blood pressure with the auscultatory method in children and adolescents under exercise conditions

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 1009-1016

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-021-00657-7

Keywords

Blood pressure measurement; Children; Diastolic blood pressure; Exercise stress test; Korotkoff sounds

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1128516]
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia [101866]
  3. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program [RCH 1000]
  4. Big W

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The controversy over defining resting diastolic blood pressure in children and adolescents as the onset of the fourth or fifth Korotkoff phase continues. A study found that a hybrid approach using K4 or K5 produced reasonable measurements in 97% of participants, indicating the potential for more reliable DBP assessments.
Controversy surrounds whether to define resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the onset of the fourth or fifth Korotkoff phase (K4, sound muffling, or K5, sound disappearance) in children and adolescents. Although undetectable in some children (due to sounds continuing to zero cuff pressure), K5 is currently recommended for consistency with adult practice and because K4 can be difficult to discern or undetectable. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically assessed the reliability of measuring DBP with K4 and K5 in children and adolescents under exercise conditions. We therefore measured DBP before and immediately after a Bruce protocol stress test in 90 children and adolescents aged 12.3 +/- 3.5 years (mean +/- SD) in a cardiology clinic setting. When detected, K4 and K5 were 63.5 +/- 9.2 and 60.2 +/- 12.6 mmHg, respectively, at rest and 59.2 +/- 14.6 mmHg (p = 0.028 vs rest) and 52.9 +/- 18.3 mmHg (p < 0.001), respectively, immediately post-exercise. K4 and K5 were not detected in 41% and 4% of participants at rest or in 29% and 37% post-exercise, respectively, while K5 resulted in unrealistic DBP values (<30 mmHg) in an additional 11%. Better exercise performance was associated with a more frequent absence of K5 post-exercise, and after excluding participants performing at <10th percentile for age, post-exercise K4 was absent in 23%, and plausible K5 values were not obtained in 59% (p < 0.001). Although neither K4 nor K5 alone were reliable measures of DBP immediately post-exercise, a novel hybrid approach using K4, if detected, or K5, if not, produced reasonable DBP measurements in 97% of participants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available