4.7 Review

Principles and open questions in functional brain network reconstruction

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 3680-3711

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25462

Keywords

brain dynamics; brain topology; edges; functional imaging; functional networks; nodes; resting state; structure– function relationship; temporal networks

Funding

  1. H2020 European Research Council [851255]
  2. Emil Aaltonen Foundation [190095]
  3. Osk. Huttunen Foundation
  4. Labex (laboratory of excellence) DISTALZ (Development of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary approach to Alzheimer's disease)
  5. Accueil de Talents of the Metropole Europeenne de Lille
  6. Severo Ochoa and Maria de Maeztu Program
  7. Spanish State Research Agency
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [851255] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graph theory is becoming a standard tool in system-level neuroscience, but the theoretical assumptions and methodological choices involved in representing brain anatomy and dynamics as complex networks can impact the reconstruction of networks from experimental data. By reviewing fundamental concepts and technical issues related to brain network reconstruction, we discuss how their mutual influence helps clarify the organization of brain function.
Graph theory is now becoming a standard tool in system-level neuroscience. However, endowing observed brain anatomy and dynamics with a complex network representation involves often covert theoretical assumptions and methodological choices which affect the way networks are reconstructed from experimental data, and ultimately the resulting network properties and their interpretation. Here, we review some fundamental conceptual underpinnings and technical issues associated with brain network reconstruction, and discuss how their mutual influence concurs in clarifying the organization of brain function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available