4.5 Article

Inner ear drug delivery through a cochlear implant: Pharmacokinetics in a Macaque experimental model

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 404, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108228

Keywords

Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Hearing loss; Round window approach; Dexamethasone; Drug delivery

Funding

  1. Cochlear Limited

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop a model of inner ear pharmacokinetics by delivering FITC-Dextran directly into the cochlea using an implantable pump connected to a CI electrode array in non-human primates. Results showed different patterns of FITC-Dextran quantification depending on the delivery group, with statistically significant differences observed between the 2 hours and 24 hours groups and 2 hours and 7 days groups. The study concluded that an infusion time ranging from 2 to 24 hours is required to reach a maximum concentration peak at the apex, establishing an even concentration profile from base to apex.
Objectives: The method of drug delivery directly into the cochlea with an implantable pump connected to a CI electrode array ensures long-term delivery and effective dose control, and also provides the possibility to use different drugs. The objective is to develop a model of inner ear pharmacokinetics of an implanted cochlea, with the delivery of FITC-Dextran, in the non-human primate model. Design: A preclinical cochlear electrode array (CI Electrode Array HL14DD, manufactured by Cochlear Ltd.) attached to an implantable peristaltic pump filled with FITC-Dextran was implanted unilaterally in a total of 15 Macaca fascicularis (Mf). Three groups were created (5 Mf in each group), according to three different drug delivery times: 2 hours, 24 hours and 7 days. Perilymph (10 samples, 1 mu L each) was sampled from the apex of the cochlea and measured immediately after extraction with a spectrofluorometer. After scarifying the specimens, x-Rays and histological analysis were performed. Results: Surgery, sampling and histological analysis were performed successfully in all specimens. FITC-Dextran quantification showed different patterns, depending on the delivery group. In the 2 hours injection experiment, an increase in FITC-Dextran concentrations over the sample collection time was seen, reaching maximum concentration peaks (420-964 mu M) between samples 5 and 7, decreasing in successive samples, without returning to baseline. The 24-hours and 7-days injection experiments showed even behaviour throughout the 10 samples obtained, reaching a plateau with mean concentrations ranging from 2144 to 2564 mu M and from 1409 to 2502 mu M, respectively. Statistically significant differences between the 2 hours and 24 hours groups (p = 0.001) and between the 2 hours and 7 days groups (p = 0.037) were observed, while between the 24 hours and 7 days groups no statistical differences were found. Conclusions: This experimental study shows that a model of drug delivery and pharmacokinetics using an active pump connected to an electrode array is feasible in Mf. An infusion time ranging from 2 to 24 hours is required to reach a maximum concentration peak at the apex. It establishes then an even concentration profile from base to apex that is maintained throughout the infusion time in Mf. Flow mechanisms during injection and during sampling that may explain such findings may involve cochlear aqueduct flow as well as the possible existence of substance exchange from scala tympani to extracellular spaces, such as the modiolar space or the endolymphatic sinus, acting as a substance reservoir to maintain a relatively flat concentration profile from base to apex during sampling. Leveraging the learnings achieved by experimentation in rodent models, we can move to experiment in non-human primate with the aim of achieving a useful model that provides transferrable data to human pharmacokinetics. Thus, it may broaden clinical and therapeutic approaches to inner ear diseases. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available