Journal
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 1158-1167Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13240
Keywords
Bradford; COVID-19; misinformation; qualitative; vaccine hesitancy
Categories
Funding
- Health foundation Covid-19 Award [2301201]
- Wellcome Trust infrastructure grant [WT101597MA]
- National Institute for Health Research under Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber [NIHR200166]
- ActEarly UK Prevention Research Partnership Consortium [MR/S037527/1]
- MRC [MR/S037527/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is influenced by safety concerns, negative stories, and personal knowledge. Participants who felt confused, distressed, and mistrusting about their social worlds during the pandemic were less positive about a vaccine. It is important to understand the relationship between misinformation spread and emotional reactions in order to counter vaccine hesitancy effectively.
Background COVID-19 vaccines can offer a route out of the pandemic, yet initial research suggests that many are unwilling to be vaccinated. A rise in the spread of misinformation is thought to have played a significant role in vaccine hesitancy. To maximize uptake, it is important to understand why misinformation has been able to take hold at this time and why it may pose a more significant problem within certain contexts. Objective To understand people's COVID-19 beliefs, their interactions with (mis)information during COVID-19 and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccine. Design and Participants Bradford, UK, was chosen as the study site to provide evidence to local decision makers. In-depth phone interviews were carried out with 20 people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford during Autumn 2020. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Results Participants discussed a wide range of COVID-19 misinformation they had encountered, resulting in confusion, distress and mistrust. Vaccine hesitancy could be attributed to three prominent factors: safety concerns, negative stories and personal knowledge. The more confused, distressed and mistrusting participants felt about their social worlds during the pandemic, the less positive they were about a vaccine. Conclusions COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy needs to be understood in the context of the relationship between the spread of misinformation and associated emotional reactions. Vaccine programmes should provide a focused, localized and empathetic response to counter misinformation. Patient or Public Contribution A rapid community and stakeholder engagement process was undertaken to identify COVID-19 priority topics important to Bradford citizens and decision makers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available