4.6 Article

Rock-physics constrained seismic anisotropy parameter estimation

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages MR247-MR253

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2019-0153.1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared with isotropic media, transversely isotropic media in P-wave seismic data processing and interpretation involve at least two extra parameters. Previous studies have shown the challenges in estimating anisotropy parameters even with low noise level seismic data. Considering the physical relationships between anisotropy parameters can improve the accuracy of estimates during the inversion process.
Compared with isotropic media, at least two extra parameters are involved in common P-wave seismic data processing and interpretation for transversely isotropic media. Previous synthetic model testing has shown that it is challenging to estimate anisotropy parameters even using extremely low noise level seismic data from a simple geologic setting. Although theoretically independent, anisotropy parameters are not free variables for organic-rich mudrocks whose elastic properties are often approximated by transverse isotropy. One potential approach to improve the accuracy in the estimated anisotropy parameters is to consider the physical relationships between them during the inversion process. To test this proposition, we first modify a commonly used nonhyperbolic reflection moveout equation as a function of the interval anisotropy velocities so that rock-physics constraints could be effectively applied to each layer. The rock physics constraints are established from data analysis of selected laboratory anisotropy measurement data. The laboratory data are then used to parameterize hundreds of 15-layer transverse isotropy models using a Monte Carlo simulation. The synthetic model testing indicates that the accuracy of the estimated anisotropy parameters can be improved if the relationships between the anisotropy parameters are considered during the inversion process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available