Heterotrophic Respiration and the Divergence of Productivity and Carbon Sequestration

Net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often used interchangeably, as their difference, heterotrophic respiration (soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux, R-SH = NPP-NEP), is assumed a near-fixed fraction of NPP. Here, we show, using a range-wide replicated experimental study in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations that R-SH responds differently than NPP to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to the divergent responses of NPP and NEP. Across the natural range of the species, the moderate responses of NPP (+11%) and R-SH (-7%) to fertilization combined such that NEP increased nearly threefold in ambient control and 43% under drought treatment. A 13% decline in R-SH under drought led to a 26% increase in NEP while NPP was unaltered. Such drought benefit for carbon sequestration was nearly twofold in control, but disappeared under fertilization. Carbon sequestration efficiency, NEP:NPP, varied twofold among sites, and increased up to threefold under both drought and fertilization.

Automated summary

In a replicated experimental study in loblolly pine plantations, it was found that soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux responds differently than net primary productivity to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to divergent responses of net primary productivity and net ecosystem production. The responses of net primary productivity and soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux to fertilization combined to increase net ecosystem production significantly under drought treatment.