Journal
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 226, Issue 2, Pages 795-802Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab134
Keywords
Inverse theory; Numerical modelling; Waveform inversion; Computational seismology; Seismic anisotropy; Theoretical seismology
Categories
Funding
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0601206]
- ANR HIWAI [ANR-16-CE31-0022-01]
- China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201804910289]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the field of seismic imaging, full waveform inversion (FWI) is popular due to its lower numerical cost, but the acoustic approximation may lead to non-uniqueness issues. Therefore, results of acoustic inversions based on hand-limited data should be interpreted with caution.
In the context of seismic imaging, full waveform inversion (FWI) is increasingly popular. Because of its lower numerical cost, the acoustic approximation is often used, especially at the exploration geophysics scale, both for tests and for real data. Moreover, some research domains such as helioseismology face true acoustic media for which FWI can be useful. In this work, an argument that combines particle relabelling and homogenization is used to show that the general acoustic inverse problem based on hand-limited data is intrinsically non-unique. It follows that the results of such inversions should be interpreted with caution. To illustrate these ideas, we consider 2-D numerical FWI examples based on a Gauss-Newton iterative inversion scheme and demonstrate effects of this non-uniqueness in the local optimization context.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available