4.7 Review

Integrated genomic selection for rapid improvement of crops

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 1070-1086

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.02.007

Keywords

Genomic selection; Speed breeding; GEBVs; Genetic gain; Marker; Prediction accuracy

Funding

  1. ICAR-IIWBR, Karnal, Haryana, India [CRSCIIWBRSIL201500300184.5]
  2. ICAR, New Delhi, India [CRSCIIWBRSIL201500300184.5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing the rate of crop improvement is crucial for sustained food production and meeting the needs of a growing population. Genomic selection offers accelerated breeding cycles through the rapid selection of superior genotypes, with advantages in prediction accuracy and efficiency over other breeding methods. Integrating novel technologies into GS can further enhance efficiency and speed, facilitating the development of new varieties.
An increase in the rate of crop improvement is essential for achieving sustained food production and other needs of ever-increasing population. Genomic selection (GS) is a potential breeding tool that has been successfully employed in animal breeding and is being incorporated into plant breeding. GS promises accelerated breeding cycles through a rapid selection of superior genotypes. Numerous empirical and simulation studies on GS and realized impacts on improvement in the crop yields are recently being reported. For a holistic understanding of the technology, we briefly discuss the concept of genetic gain, GS methodology, its current status, advantages of GS over other breeding methods, prediction models, and the factors controlling prediction accuracy in GS. Also, integration of speed breeding and other novel technologies viz. high throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies for enhancing the efficiency and pace of GS, followed by its prospective applications in varietal development programs is reviewed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available