4.5 Article

How many gait initiation trials are necessary to reliably detect anticipatory postural adjustments and first step characteristics in healthy elderly and people with Parkinson's disease?

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 126-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.016

Keywords

Anticipatory postural adjustment; Gait initiation; Reliability; Parkinson's disease

Funding

  1. Jacques & Gloria Gossweiler Foundation, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that reliability of gait initiation varies across outcomes but is similar for healthy elderly and individuals with Parkinson's disease with Freezing of Gait, under single and dual task conditions. Anticipatory postural adjustments and first step range of motion are the most reliable outcomes, while APA duration and latency are the least reliable. Future studies should consider conducting multiple trials of gait initiation depending on the specific outcome of interest to improve reliability.
Background: The gait initiation (GI) process can be characterized by anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and first step characteristics. However, even within a constrained environment, it is unclear how many trials are necessary to obtain a reliable measurement of the GI process within one assessment. Research question: How many gait initiation trials are necessary to reliably detect APAs and first step characteristics in healthy elderly (HC) and people with Parkinson's disease with Freezing of Gait (PD + FOG) under single (ST) and dual task (DT) conditions and are there any potential systematic errors? Methods: Thirty-eight PD + FOG (ON-medication) and 30 HC performed 5 trials of GI under ST and DT (auditory stroop test). APAs and first-step-outcomes were captured with IMUs placed on the lower back and on each foot. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) were computed to investigate reliability and mixed model analysis to find potential systematic errors. Additionally, we computed an estimation for the number of necessary trials to reach acceptable reliability (ICC = 0.75) for each outcome. Results: ICCs varied from low reliability to excellent reliability across outcomes in PD + FOG and HC. ICCs were comparable under ST and DT for most outcomes. SEM results confirmed the ICC results. A systematic error was found for the first trial in first step ROM. Number of necessary trials varied largely across outcomes. Significance: Within-session reliability varied across outcomes but was similar for PD + FOG and HC, and ST and DT. ML size of APA and first step ROM were most reliable, whereas APA duration and latency were least reliable. Depending on the outcome of interest, future studies should conduct multiple trials of GI to increase reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available