4.7 Article

Early detection of cyberbullying on social media networks

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2021.01.006

Keywords

Cyberbullying; Social networks; Early detection; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain
  2. FEDER funds of the European Union [PID2019-111388GB-I00]
  3. Centro de Investigacion de Galicia CITIC - Xunta de Galicia (Galicia, Spain)
  4. European Union (European Regional Development Fund - Galicia 2014-2020 Program) [ED431G 2019/01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses different approaches to early detection of cyberbullying on social networks, proposing two sets of features and two early detection methods that have successfully improved baseline detection models by up to 42%.
Cyberbullying is an important issue for our society and has a major negative effect on the victims, that can be highly damaging due to the frequency and high propagation provided by Information Technologies. Therefore, the early detection of cyberbullying in social networks becomes crucial to mitigate the impact on the victims. In this article, we aim to explore different approaches that take into account the time in the detection of cyberbullying in social networks. We follow a supervised learning method with two different specific early detection models, named threshold and dual. The former follows a more simple approach, while the latter requires two machine learning models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to investigate the early detection of cyberbullying. We propose two groups of features and two early detection methods, specifically designed for this problem. We conduct an extensive evaluation using a real world dataset, following a time-aware evaluation that penalizes late detections. Our results show how we can improve baseline detection models up to 42%. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available