4.7 Article

Towards user-centric, switching cost-aware fog node selection strategies

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.12.006

Keywords

Fog computing; Edge computing; Mobility management; Multi-armed bandits; Switching cost

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RTI2018-094532-B-100, TEC2015-66220-R]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [RTI2018-094532-B-100, TEC2015-66220-R]
  3. H2020 EU mF2C project [730929]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a block-based FN selection scheme and a greedy selection approach to tackle the issues of uncertainty and dynamics in fog computing environments. Simulation results demonstrate the significant improvement in FN selection performance using both methods.
In order to address high latency issues that may arise when executing time-critical applications at the cloud side, the novel fog computing paradigm has emerged, thus enabling the execution of such applications within computation nodes present at the edge of the network. While executing such applications, a user may be moving in an area where a high number of heterogeneous fog nodes (FNs) co-exist. This makes the problem of selecting the most appropriate fog node to execute the user's tasks challenging, especially since the set of visible FNs dynamically changes. Therefore, to deal with the uncertain and dynamic nature of such a fog computing environment, we model the FN selection problem using multi-armed bandits. However, standard solutions for the bandit problem are not tailored for scenarios with changing FN availabilities. In addition, since switching from one FN to the other causes a switching cost, such solutions lead to accumulating a high switching cost. Therefore, to address these issues, we first propose a block-based FN selection scheme, where switching among FNs is not allowed during a block of timeslots. We also propose a greedy approach, where FNs having a sufficiently good delay performance are selected in a greedy manner. Simulation results reveal that both approaches significantly improve the FN selection performance. In particular, we found that the block-based selection results in the lowest switching costs, whereas the greedy selection achieves the best overall performance. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available