4.5 Article

Clinical Recognition of Sensory Ataxia and Cerebellar Ataxia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.639871

Keywords

cerebellar ataxia; clinical recognition; microwave; sensory ataxia; wireless sensing technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ataxia is an external characteristic of poor coordination and balance disorder in the human body, which may be caused by various internal factors. The diagnosis relies on observed external characteristics and the personal clinical experience of doctors. This study introduces a novel non-contact sensing technique for detecting and distinguishing different types of ataxia, achieving high accuracies through the use of Romberg's test, gait analysis data, and machine learning approaches.
Ataxia is a kind of external characteristics when the human body has poor coordination and balance disorder, it often indicates diseases in certain parts of the body. Many internal factors may causing ataxia; currently, observed external characteristics, combined with Doctor's personal clinical experience play main roles in diagnosing ataxia. In this situation, different kinds of diseases may be confused, leading to the delay in treatment and recovery. Modern high precision medical instruments would provide better accuracy but the economic cost is a non-negligible factor. In this paper, novel non-contact sensing technique is used to detect and distinguish sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia. Firstly, Romberg's test and gait analysis data are collected by the microwave sensing platform; then, after some preprocessing, some machine learning approaches have been applied to train the models. For Romberg's test, time domain features are considered, the accuracy of all the three algorithms are higher than 96%; for gait detection, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used for dimensionality reduction, and the accuracies of Back Propagation (BP) neural Network, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) are 97.8, 98.9, and 91.1%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available