4.5 Article

Determining the costs and benefits of Scientific Forest Management in Nepal

Journal

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102426

Keywords

Benefits; Community forest; Costs; Policy; Determinants; Nepal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzes the costs and benefits for users in scientifically-managed community forests in Nepal. It found a decrease in costs and a threefold increase in benefits under Scientific Forest Management. Forest products account for 80% of the benefits, with high class users contributing more. Further research is needed to analyze changes in users' costs in response to potential changes in their roles.
Scientific Forest Management (ScFM) is gaining scholarly and policy attention in Nepal. This interest validates the need for evidence on the costs and benefits for users in scientifically-managed community forests. This paper analyzes the costs incurred and the benefits that accrue to users under ScFM. Data was generated through a survey of 200 household representatives in the Nawalparasi Bardaghat-Susta East District of Nepal. This was complemented by two focus group discussions with forestry officials and forest users, and document reviews. Multiple linear regression analyses and student (-tests were used for data analyses. The results indicate a decrease in the costs incurred by users after the implementation of ScFM, and a threefold increase in the derived benefits. Overall, forest products account for 80% of the benefits derived by users under ScFM, with high class users contributing more than middle and low class ones. While this study provides useful insights on users' costs and benefits under ScFM, it underscores the need for further studies to analyze changes in users' costs, in the face of potential changes in their roles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available