Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A comparative assessment of the difficulty of authorship attribution in Greek and in English
Patrick Juola et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2019)
Document embeddings learned on various types of n-grams for cross-topic authorship attribution
Helena Gomez-Adorno et al.
COMPUTING (2018)
A call for more science in forensic science
Suzanne Bell et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
An authorship analysis of the hack the Ripper letters
Andrea Nini
DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP IN THE HUMANITIES (2018)
A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
Didier Meuwly et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics
Anderson Rocha et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY (2017)
Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners
Jeff Kukucka et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2017)
The Rowling Case: A Proposed Standard Analytic Protocol for Authorship Questions
Patrick Juola
DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP IN THE HUMANITIES (2015)
Do Confessions Taint Perceptions of Handwriting Evidence? An Empirical Test of the Forensic Confirmation Bias
Jeff Kukucka et al.
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2014)
Menzerath-Altmann law for distinct word distribution analysis in a large text
Sertac Eroglu
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS (2013)
Keyboard- Behavior-Based Authentication
Patrick Juola et al.
IT PROFESSIONAL (2013)
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions
Saul M. Kassin et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2013)
A SURVEY OF CLUSTERING ENSEMBLE ALGORITHMS
Sandro Vega-Pons et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2011)
Automatically Profiling the Author of an Anonymous Text
Shlomo Argamon et al.
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM (2009)
Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications
IE Dror et al.
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL (2006)
The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition
C Champod et al.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION (2000)
Share Paper
