4.7 Article

A novel near infrared spectroscopy analytical strategy for meat and bone meal species discrimination based on the insight of fraction composition complexity

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128645

Keywords

Meat and bone meal; Near infrared spectroscopy; Species discrimination; PLS-DA; Sequential classification strategy

Funding

  1. National Key R&D program Intergovernmental / Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan key projects [2019YFE0103800]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-36]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the complexity of meat and bone meal (MBM) and proposed a classification strategy to accurately and rapidly identify MBM species. Using Partial Least Squares-Discrimination Analysis (PLS-DA) based on full samples, lower classification errors were achieved, and bone fraction content showed positive correlation with most MBM species differences.
This study analyzed the meat and bone meal (MBM) matrix complexity from the perspective of fraction composition diversity and a classification strategy was proposed to accurately and rapidly identify the MBM species based on near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Partial Least Squares-Discrimination Analysis (PLS-DA) based on full samples, meat meal (MM), MBM and bone meal (BM) performed with decreasing classification errors of 0.115, 0.079, 0.044 and 0.039 which were partly caused by wide sample range; bone fraction content had positive correlation with most of MBM species differences reflected by principal component scores; and PLSDA classification errors among MM, MBM and BM were lower than 0.013. To take fully advantage of the above results, a sequential classification strategy was proposed; near infrared spectra were selected (belong to MM, MBM or BM) and then species discrimination analysis was conducted based on the specific PLS-DA model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available