4.5 Article

Fatigue response dependence of thickness measurement methods for additively manufactured E-PBF Ti-6Al-4 V

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13461

Keywords

additive materials; fatigue; surface roughness; Ti‐ 6al‐ 4v

Funding

  1. Clean Sky 2 joint undertaking under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (research and innovation program) [738002]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [738002] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced by electron beam powder bed fusion with different wall thicknesses and orientations. Specimens at 90 degrees direction exhibited worse fatigue life, and the fatigue strength was lower for thin samples compared to thicker ones. Considering surface roughness in stress level calculations reduced or eliminated the influence of specimen thickness.
Light weight metal parts produced with additive manufacturing have gained increasing interest from the aerospace industry in recent years. However, light weight parts often require thin walls which can have different material properties compared to thick bulk material. In this work, the fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4 V produced by electron beam powder bed fusion have been investigated for samples with three different wall thicknesses ranging from 1.3 to 2.7 mm and in three different directions; 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees relative to the build plate. Generally, the 90 degrees specimens show worse fatigue life compared to both 0 degrees and 45 degrees. It was found that the fatigue strength is lower for thin samples compared to thicker samples when the stress is calculated from nominal thickness or calliper measurements. However, since materials produced by electron beam powder bed fusion often have a rough as-built surface, the load bearing area is not easy to determine. In this paper, four different methods for determining the load bearing area are presented. It is shown that if the surface roughness is considered when calculating the stress levels, the influence from specimen thickness decreases or even disappears.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available