4.6 Review

High-frequency ultrasound as a scientific tool for skin imaging analysis

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 897-910

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14363

Keywords

ageing; dermis; echogenicity; epidermis; high‐ frequency ultrasound; imaging analysis; skin

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2018/06973-4]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [0001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [18/06973-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) is a valuable technique in dermatology, providing real-time imaging of skin layers and lesions for diagnosis, management, and therapy monitoring. It is also useful for assessing the performance of dermatological products, which may become essential in the future.
Ultrasonic imaging is one of the most important diagnostic tools in clinical medicine due to its cost, availability and good correlation with pathological results. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) is a technique used in skin science that has been little explored, especially in comparison with other sites and imaging techniques. HFUS shows real-time images of the skin layers, appendages and skin lesions in vivo and can significantly contribute to advances in skin science. This review summarizes the potential applications of HFUS in dermatology and cosmetology, with a focus on quantitative tools that can be used to assess various skin conditions. Our findings showed that HFUS imaging is a reproducible and powerful tool for the diagnosis, clinical management and therapy monitoring of skin conditions. It is also a helpful tool for assessing the performance of dermatological products. This technique may eventually become essential for evaluating the performance of dermatological and cosmetic products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available