4.4 Review

Cytokinesis regulators as potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for human hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 246, Issue 12, Pages 1343-1354

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/15353702211008380

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; cytokinesis; therapeutic targets

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars [LR21H160001]
  2. Start-up Grant of HZNU [4125C5021820470]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802338, 82072646, 81903143]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article summarizes the importance of cytokinesis in maintaining cell ploidy level and its critical role in human hepatocellular carcinoma, including inducing abnormal cell ploidy and being potential therapeutic targets.
Cytokinesis, the final step of mitosis, is critical for maintaining the ploidy level of cells. Cytokinesis is a complex, highly regulated process and its failure can lead to genetic instability and apoptosis, contributing to the development of cancer. Human hepatocellular carcinoma is often accompanied by a high frequency of aneuploidy and the DNA ploidy pattern observed in human hepatocellular carcinoma results mostly from impairments in cytokinesis. Many key regulators of cytokinesis are abnormally expressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma, and their expression levels are often correlated with patient prognosis. Moreover, preclinical studies have demonstrated that the inhibition of key cytokinesis regulators can suppress the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of the signaling networks regulating cytokinesis, the key cytokinesis regulators involved in the initiation and development of human hepatocellular carcinoma, and their applications as potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available