4.4 Article

High income men have high value as long-term mates in the US: personal income and the probability of marriage, divorce, and childbearing in the US

Journal

EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 409-417

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.004

Keywords

Evolutionary psychology; Fertility; Marriage; Childlesness; Divorce; Sex differences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that high income men are more likely to marry, divorce, and remarry, and are less likely to be childless; while high income women are less likely to remarry after divorce and more likely to be childless.
Using data from the first Census data set that includes complete measures of male biological fertility for a large-scale probability sample of the U.S. population (the 2014 wave of the Study of Income and Program Participation-N = 55,281), this study shows that high income men are more likely to marry, are less likely to divorce, if divorced are more likely to remarry, and are less likely to be childless than low income men. Men who remarry marry relatively younger women than other men, on average, although this does not vary by personal income. For men who divorce who have children, high income is not associated with an increased probability of having children with new partners. Income is not associated with the probability of marriage for women and is positively associated with the probability of divorce. High income women are less likely to remarry after divorce and more likely to be childless than low income women. For women who divorce who have children, high income is associated with a lower chance of having children with new partners, although the relationship is curvilinear. These results are behavioral evidence that women are more likely than men to prioritize earning capabilities in a long-term mate and suggest that high income men have high value as long-term mates in the U.S.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available