4.7 Article

Spherically symmetric analytic solutions and naked singularities in Einstein-Aether theory

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09120-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPERJ [E-26/171.533/2002, E-26/170.951/2006, E-26/171.754/2000]
  2. CNPq-Brazil
  3. FINEP-Brazil [2399/03]
  4. FAPERJ/UERJ [307935/2018-3]
  5. CAPES (CAPES-PRINT) [41/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The text analyzes all possible spherically symmetric exterior vacuum solutions allowed by the Einstein-Aether theory with static aether. Three classes of solutions are identified based on different values of a combination of free parameters, with explicit analytical solutions provided for specific cases. There are singularities present in some solutions while others are asymptotically flat spacetimes without horizons. This characteristic is different from general relativity. Additionally, the thermodynamics for the case where a horizon exists is briefly discussed.
We analyze all the possible spherically symmetric exterior vacuum solutions allowed by the Einstein-Aether theory with static aether. We show that there are three classes of solutions corresponding to different values of a combination of the free parameters, c(14) = c(1) + c(4), which are: 0 < c(14) < 2, c(14) < 0, and c(14) = 0. We present explicit analytical solutions for c(14) = 3/2, 16/9, 48/25,-16 and 0. The first case has some pathological behavior, while the rest have all singularities at r = 0 and are asymptotically flat spacetimes. For the solutions c(14) = 16/9, 48/25 and - 16 we show that there exist no horizons, neither Killing horizon nor universal horizon, thus we have naked singularities. This characteristic is completely different from general relativity. We briefly discuss the thermodynamics for the case c(14) = 0 where the horizon exists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available